Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Linkedin button
Delicious button
Digg button
Archives for category: technology

I’ve heard that question being uttered numerous times. Regardless of whether it’s said in jest or with a straight face, there’s always a strong element of truth hiding behind that seemingly innocent query. I have spent the last few months trying to deconstruct this seemingly eternal question and I’m particularly interested in helping high school students figure things out, though I think that what I’m doing can benefit anyone who ponders the question.

During my research, I’ve talked to numerous people, ranging from high school students to public school teachers and officials and everyone in between. Just last week, I sat down with a family in Durham to discuss this challenge. The couple I met with, Phil and Jane, are the parents of David, who’s a junior in high school. David is in the middle of trying to decide what major to pursue and where to attend college.

The four of us talked at their dinner table, and I learned a lot from our conversation. Even with the support of two extremely intelligent and involved parents, it is still not an easy decision for David, an extremely bright student, to make. The current research resources available to him (primarily books), while of good quality, are dry and not in the least bit engaging. As our discussion progressed, many of the observations I’ve made during my research were reinforced. Some of those observations, in no particular order, include:

  • Choosing a career, which should be infinitely fun given the world of opportunity ahead of them, makes high school students afraid and confused!
  • These students really do care about their future
  • The majority of resources available to help them chart their future are old school and not very interesting
  • The process of determining a career is an extremely social activity for them (involves parents, friends, family, teachers)
  • They struggle with relating the here and now with what they might do in the future (e.g. why am I studying this when it will never be of any use to me?)
  • There is a need for greater exposure to the multitude of potential career options that may fit their personalities and interests
  • Many students want to effect a positive change, but feel that earning a paycheck and doing good are mutually exclusive
  • Students want to discover their future calling(s) on their terms, in their domains, through the channels they use
  • Given these bits of knowledge, I am confident that the task of answering the question “What do I want to be when I grow up?” can be made a little less daunting. In Part 2 of this post, I’ll examine some of my thoughts on how to address this challenge.

    Google just announced its plans to create its own broadband network, which will serve the needs of between 50,000 – 500,000 people. The interesting things to note about Google’s announcement are:

  • The service will provide 1 gigabit per second, fiber connections!
  • The locations have yet to be decided (see below)
  • It will be a paid service, unlike Google’s other data initiatives. Google claims it will be ‘competitive’
  • While the move is laudable, and certainly welcome from the standpoint of having choice (RoadRunner is the monopoly for wired Internet where I live), the prospect of Google now owning the gateway through which all my data flows leaves me a little uneasy. Google’s corporate vision of

    To organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.

    is not exactly in alignment with my desire to keep as much of my personal information, well, personal.
    I am certain that Google would like to and someday, be able to tell marketers exactly what meals I enjoy cooking and eating, what types of movies I like best and precisely how much I spend on electronics every year. That day really is inevitable. I, however, will do my bit to delay it and will not sign up to include Durham, North Carolina for consideration for the trial markets. If you, on the other hand, want to sign your community up for consideration, you can do so here

    This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by Roy Tanck. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.

    The Triangle Startup Factory, a soon-to-be-launched incubator had its first entrepreneur mixer earlier this evening and approximately 60-80 people attended the event. Triangle Startup Factory is a 3-month business accelerator that helps software and web companies get their business of the ground. The incubator’s office is in the gorgeous American Tobacco Campus in downtown Durham and if tonight’s response to the event was any indication, one of the key ingredients in a vibrant startup community – entrepreneurial energy – is present in abundant quantities.

    I recently discovered Original Projects, a web service that describes itself as

    … a place where you can share and cultivate your original projects with the world (or just with certain people in the world); where you can connect and collaborate not based on who they are—but what you do and aspire to do; and where you can link and network with other users who have the resources that you might need to develop your projects.

    I think it’s safe to say that Original Projects is effectively a crowdsourcing platform for any idea. I like Original Projects a lot primarily because it helps solve a real problem, i.e. finding and connecting with people who have the same goal you do and who have abilities that complement yours. I also like Original Projects because it’s located in downtown Durham and is another addition to a slowly growing collection of web and software companies in Durham that include reverbnation (co-founded by one of my friends, Jed Carlson), Bronto Software, Shoeboxed, Digitalsmiths and iContact.

    I had a chance to talk to Nathan Wieler*, CEO and founder of Original Projects this evening and he described it as a platform for any kind of collaborative effort, whether it’s a physical product or intangibles such as ideas, concepts or goals. Some of the features Nathan says he plans to introduce are resources to help users of the site to develop their own companies, including legal and business resources and project management tools. He also envisions a marketplace for ideas and projects, where intellectual property and companies or projects in various stages of development can be traded or purchased.

    In my opinion, Original Projects is eponymous. Although I’ve seen focused crowdsourcing sites, I’ve yet to come across anything that allows collaboration to occur without boundaries. I think the potential for this platform is huge and I plan to use it for my own projects.

    If you have a project that you’ve shelved because you haven’t found anyone to collaborate with, you should look into it too. The site is in beta stage right now, but you can request an invitation by visiting originalprojects.com

    * Some of you may recognize Nathan’s name from his zoom culture days or from his involvement with the original Dwell house

    I absolutely love this low-tech approach to advertising Google’s Chrome browser. It has a simple charm that is difficult to resist and virtually impossible to forget.

    This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by Roy Tanck. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.

    The iPad was announced earlier this week at a special event held in San Francisco and I, like many other people, held high hopes for this device that Steve Jobs is purportedly quoted as saying

    “…will be the most important thing I’ve ever done.”

    I followed the announcement intently and admittedly, like tons of other people, felt a little underwhelmed by what I saw. Apple suffers the paradox of being both the darling of the tech gadget world, as well as its biggest target for derision, so when the event ended and the product didn’t live up to the rumors, the collective sigh of disappointment was loud enough to eventually find its way to other galaxies if someone there cares to listen.

    After pausing to think a little, though, I realized that though the iPad didn’t meet the expectations of those of us who care about the latest and greatest and who expect nothing less than mind-blowing revolutions in computing every time Steve Jobs takes the stage, it will still be a success. I predict that the majority of the gadget-buying public will love this product and I further predict that the iPad will be a smash hit in the education space. If you’ll hang with me for a bit, I’d like to proffer my thoughts on why I claim the latter.

    Now, you will never hear me claim to be an expert on the tech space OR the education space, but I did spend 1.5 years of my life working as a notebook product manager at Lenovo focusing on the K12 education market. I was tasked with understanding this market’s needs and figuring out if we could successfully create a product that was both ideal for student learning and fit in school budgets. Sadly, the answer was ‘no’ at that point in time. However, the things I learned during that time did give me good insight into what a good computing device for helping students learn would look like and I’ve listed them below and graded the iPad against each one. They are loosely ranked in order of importance; different schools and school districts assigned the priorities a little differently.

    1. Price
    A $499 price point is very reasonable for a capable computing device that schools and school districts can deploy en masse. Additionally, I think it’s safe to assume that Apple will offer a fairly substantial discount on the iPad for large, institutional orders. Apple has a significant advantage vis a vis its competition here, as it often sells an entire educational eco-system, made up of hardware, software, training and support and professional services. These ‘package deals’ can easily mask or help defray the cost of discounting the hardware, making the iPad a very tempting purchase for schools with decimated budgets.

    2. Durability
    Three of school IT departments’ most significant service complaints involved display breakage, keyboard keycaps popping off and spinning platter hard drive failures. The iPad addresses the latter two complaints by not even having those components and choosing a virtual keyboard and flash storage instead. While drops and accidental (or intentional!) stabbing of the screen will still be present, the tough unibody construction of the iPad will prevent displays from cracking because of flexion, a very common occurrence in the school environment.

    3. Battery life
    If the iPad lives up to its claims of 10 hours of *usable* battery life, then it will easily surpass the battery life on the majority of notebooks and netbooks with standard batteries easily. Needless to say, any education device has to last at least as long as the schoolday, and often, beyond that. The majority of educators and school IT directors said that 6 hours of battery life was the absolute minimum. The iPad should meet this requirement quite easily.

    4. Size and weight

    “Small, but not too small. The screen has to be big enough to be usable”

    “It has to be light. These kids are already carrying bookbags that adults will struggle to carry”

    These are direct quotes from educators and school administrators. With a gorgeous 9.7″, 1024 x 768 IPS display and maximum weight of 1.6 lbs (models with the 3G card), the iPad fits those requirements nicely.

    5. Ubiquitous access
    One of the promises of technology in education is ubiquitous access – the idea that any student, anywhere, can gain access to the knowledge resources they need to learn, think, collaborate and create. One of the fundamental components of ubiquitous access is the ability to easily connect to repositories of information and to systems and tools that allow educators and students to connect with each other. The iPad has both WiFi and mobile broadband capability, which supports ubiquitous access. Furthermore, the already heavily discounted 3G plan that Apple’s managed to hammer out with AT&T will become even cheaper in a large scale deployment.

    6. Touch + slate form factor
    Many educators I spoke to cited touch as a feature that would allow them to really explore new learning techniques and help technology fulfill its promise in the classroom. Many said that they would love a slate or a convertible tablet with touch, form factors they felt were superior to a notebook with touch as an afterthought. The iPad’s design inherently delivers on these requests. The little hands of younger K12 students, who have as-yet-to-be-developed fine motor skills would greatly benefit from the ability to use the most natural human-machine interface current technology allows.

    7. Space constraints
    Classrooms all over the country are becoming smaller by virtue of the rapidly growing school-going population. In small classrooms, having small devices that fit on small desks and in small charging carts is almost certainly de rigueur. The iPad’s slender profile and minuscule footprint assures compliance with this expectation.

    Those are the factors that weighed most heavily on decision makers’ minds when they studied the purchase of technology for their classrooms. However, there are other things that could make the iPad extremely favorable for the K12 education space.

    1. No multitasking
    What appears as a bane to many could turn out to be a boon for educators who want to stop students from messing around on the web or playing games while class is in session.

    2. iPad specific iWork
    I truly believe that Steve Jobs and Apple made this move specifically to address the concerns of the education market. The era of information consumption as an educational ethos is outdated and has been replaced with a push towards the 21st Century Skills of creativity, innovation, critical thinking, problem solving, communication and collaboration. In order to support this thrust, active creation is a necessity and Apple has addressed this need with a version of iWork that takes advantage of the iPad’s capabilities.

    3. Relationship with publishers
    One of the factors that’s crippling education (and the backs of many students, I’m sure) is the fact that the education publishers have refused to digitize their content. Digitizing textbooks makes perfect sense, since it’ll lighten students’ bookbags and their parents’ financial burdens considerably. I won’t go into detail about why publishers don’t want to digitize books, but I think it’s safe to say that if any computer company can convince the publishers to do it, it’ll be Apple. With the launch of the iBookstore, they’ve already proven that they can establish business partnerships with the book publishers and with all the talk about the iPad saving the publishing industry, it’s not too far-fetched to argue that the relationship may be more symbiotic than adversarial. Digitized textbooks would mesh perfectly with the iPad’s capabilities.

    4. Eco system
    I already mentioned the education eco-system that Apple already has, but I think it’s worth mentioning again, given the fact that Apple has a stronghold on this market because of their long history of commitment to this space and the fact that they truly have a complete education technology solution that encompasses hardware, software, training, support and professional development. This eco system suddenly becomes more powerful because there is an extremely attractively priced and featured product that Apple can use to lead their charge into more schools.

    My treatment of this argument has not been exhaustive, but I believe that the arguments I *have* made are legitimate. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the subject. Do you think the iPad will make a good education device?